Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is much better than LG V30's 79.1 general score. Galaxy Note10's construction is newer, but a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than LG V30. LG V30 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V30 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better processing power than LG V30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a larger back camera sensor. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V30. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG V30, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.