Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than LG V30's global score of 79.1. Galaxy S10 is a newer and just a little bit lighter phone than LG V30, but it is also just a bit thicker. The Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 features a little more vivid screen than LG V30, because it has a little larger display, a quite better screen density and a slightly higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. The LG V30 features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 shoots clearer photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S10 is also cheaper than the LG V30, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.