Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is better than the LG V30's 79.1 score. Galaxy S10 5G's design is newer, but a bit thicker and extremely heavier than LG V30. The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 5G and LG V30 both count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy S10 5G has a quite inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The LG V30 has a greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G takes slightly better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features better battery performance than LG V30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G is a little more expensive than the LG V30, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.