Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than LG V30, with an 89.7 score against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite design is much newer, but heavier and a little thicker than LG V30. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better processing power than LG V30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V30 has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher pixel count in each inch of screen. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features longer battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.