Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than LG V30's overall score of 79.1. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a newer and a bit lighter phone than the LG V30, but it's just a little thicker. Galaxy S10e features just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
LG V30 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy S10e, because it has a just a bit better pixel quantity per inch of screen, a little bit larger screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Galaxy S10e captures slightly better photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V30 has a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30 counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S10e is more expensive than LG V30, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.