Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than LG V30, with a global score of 98 against 79.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is extremely newer than LG V30, it's noticeably heavier and thicker. The LG V30 and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a just a bit lower pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos, it also counts with a much better video quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG V30, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V30. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V30, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.