Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the LG V30, with a overall score of 80.1 against 79.1. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a noticeably newer cellphone than LG V30, but it is notably heavier and much thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG V30. They have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better display than LG V30, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels quantity in each display inch. The LG V30 features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a camera with a lot better 16 mega-pixels resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V30. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG V30, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.