Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than LG V30's score of 79.1. Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is notably newer than LG V30's, but it is notably thicker and heavier. The LG V30 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The LG V30 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V30 has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size. LG V30 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs more money than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V30. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V30, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.