Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than LG V30, with a 92.3 score against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is notably newer and a little thinner than the LG V30's, but it is somewhat heavier. LG V30 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V30 features a better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a worse video resolution and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to LG V30's battery duration.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the LG V30, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.