Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is slightly better than Xperia Z4v, with a global score of 79.1 against 78.8. The LG V30 is a much newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and just a bit lighter than Xperia Z4v. Xperia Z4v has a much better screen than LG V30, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V30 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The Xperia Z4v features just a little better performance than LG V30, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a little bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a camera with a much higher 20.7 mega pixels resolution.
The LG V30 counts with a little better battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs more money than Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xperia Z4v. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V30, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xperia Z4v, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.