Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the LG V30's general score of 79.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a way newer cellphone than the LG V30, but it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V30 features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and LG V30 count with really similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
LG V30 counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V30 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.