Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has a general score of 79.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 score. The LG V30 design is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, even though it was released 3 years before. LG V30 has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V30 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. LG V30 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V30 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes much clearer photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better battery life than LG V30, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V30, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.