Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the LG V30's score of 79.1. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro construction is newer than the LG V30's, but it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V30 counts with a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater count of pixels per inch of display.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than LG V30, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more internal storage.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro takes better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and faster video frame rates. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with better battery life than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V30. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V30, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.