Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having a score of 79.1 against 78.1. Despite of the fact that the LG V30 is extremely older than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's construction is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little faster CPU than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V30 has a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a much better camera than LG V30, and although they both have the same aperture, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a way higher video quality and a much higher resolution camera.
The LG V30 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V30, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V30 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.