Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's general score of 80.3. The LG V30S ThinQ is a somewhat lighter phone than Google Nexus 6P, but both are equally thin. LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a just a little better screen pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5% more battery capacity. Google Nexus 6P has a camera that is just as good as LG V30S ThinQ's camera, because although the Google Nexus 6P has a back facing camera with much less megapixels, a lower (4K) video definition and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Nexus 6P. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the Google Nexus 6P, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.