Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than LG V30, having an 82.5 score against 79.1. The LG V30S ThinQ has the same weight and thickness than LG V30. LG V30S ThinQ and LG V30 feature quite similar screens, they have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, a greater pixel number in each screen inch and a display of the same size.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V30, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more internal storage.
The LG V30 shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate, a F1.6 camera aperture and a same size back camera sensor. LG V30 and LG V30S ThinQ both count with really similar battery performance.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V30. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V30, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.