Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a general score of 83.7 against 82.5. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a little bigger display.
LG V50 ThinQ captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
LG V50 ThinQ has as much storage for applications and games as the LG V30S ThinQ, both have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has greater battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.