Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 82.5 score against 76.4. The LG V30S ThinQ body is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4, counting with a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a brighter screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a camera that's just as good as LG V30S ThinQ's camera, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in low-light situations and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo has improved battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.