Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 82.5 score against 77.9. The LG V30S ThinQ is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixels density. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has 4 less cpu cores (but faster) and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. LG V30S ThinQ and Motorola DROID Turbo both count with quite similar cameras, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and lower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo features superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.