Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50, having an 82.5 score against 81.2. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is noticeably older than Motorola Edge 50, it's design is lighter and just a little thinner.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a quite inferior pixels number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.