Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a general score of 86.2 against 82.5. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though Motorola Moto G200 5G is much newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it's thicker and incredibly heavier.
The Moto G200 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto G200 5G counts with a greater camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Moto G200 5G counts with a superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.