Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than Moto Z4, getting a overall score of 82.5 against 79.8. These phones use Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it gives you some additional features and performance optimizations. LG V30S ThinQ's design has the same thickness than the Moto Z4, but it's just a bit lighter.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Moto Z4, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z4 has just a bit better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 9% larger battery size.
Moto Z4 counts with a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z4. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z4, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.