Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a general score of 82.5 against 79.9. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version, so it offers a couple additional features and improved performance. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little inferior pixels count in each display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
OPPO Find X3 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with better video frame rates, a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.