Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ, having a overall score of 84.7 against 82.5. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is extremely newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, but it's a lot heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, and LG V30S ThinQ counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.