Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a global score of 90.5 against 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a newer phone than the LG V30S ThinQ, although it's somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a little better performance than LG V30S ThinQ. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A90 5G has a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V30S ThinQ has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A90 5G features superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.