Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-03-09 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though LG V30S ThinQ is a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's lighter and newer.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a better pixel count per inch in the screen and a way higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. The LG V30S ThinQ has a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with improved battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21% greater battery size. LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 16 MP, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.