Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having a general score of 83.3 against 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy M30s is a newer cellphone than the LG V30S ThinQ, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M30s has the older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy M30s features a very superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.