Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-03-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting an 86.5 score against 82.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M31 has 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy M31 construction is newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M31. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M31, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater pixels amount in each screen inch.
LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M31, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has an 82 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.