Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has an overall score of 88, which is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's general score of 82.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M31s has an older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Samsung Galaxy M31s is way newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it is noticeably heavier and a lot thicker.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M31s. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a greater camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a way better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has an 82% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.