Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 82.5 score against 77.8. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is noticeably lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is thicker and was released 6 years before. Both of these phones include Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, providing you some additional features.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a way larger screen and a bit higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit more storage to install games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG V30S ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.