Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. The LG V30S ThinQ is an noticeably older cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro, but LG was able to build it lighter and a little bit thinner.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processor than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X60 Pro features greater battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate, a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.