Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 85 against 81.3. The iPhone 8 design has the same thickness than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's just a little lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than iPhone 8, because it has a larger screen, a lot higher screen density and a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. IPhone 8 counts with a little bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone 8 has a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution camera, a lower (4K) video resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality pictures and videos.
LG V35 ThinQ features a way better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 8, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.