Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, having an 84.5 score against 81.3. The iPhone XS Max is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, we must tell that it is also way heavier and a little thicker. Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density and a quite lower 1242 x 2688 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display.
LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3179mAh. IPhone XS Max captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.