Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Nexus 6P, with an 81.3 score against 80.3. LG V35 ThinQ's construction has the same thickness than the Google Nexus 6P, but it's somewhat lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a little bigger display, a quite greater count of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ takes a bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Google Nexus 6P has a little longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.