Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, having an 81.6 score against 81.3. Google Pixel 2's construction is just a little lighter but just a little bit thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ, and they were only released with a couple of months difference. LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a bigger screen and a bit better display pixels density.
The LG V35 ThinQ has much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a much better 16 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 22% larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.