Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a global score of 81.3 against 81.3. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Google Pixel XL is an older, thicker and just a little heavier phone than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel XL, because it has a little bit better pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a little bit bigger display. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lot tinier sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and a much better 16 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Google Pixel XL features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5 percent greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.