Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the LG V30's 79.1 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction has the same weight and thickness than LG V30. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than LG V30. They have exactly the same 1440 x 2880px resolution, a display with the same size and a higher pixel amount per inch of screen. The LG V35 ThinQ and the LG V30 both feature really similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have the same internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30 counts with a camera that's very similar to the camera in LG V35 ThinQ, both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.6 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same resolution camera in the back and a 0.32 inches camera sensor. LG V30 counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the battery life in LG V35 ThinQ.
LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.