Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a global score of 81.3 against 77.9. The LG V35 ThinQ body is way newer, lighter and incredibly thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better screen pixel density. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back facing camera with much less megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Motorola DROID Turbo has better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.