Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting a global score of 81.3 against 81.2. LG V35 ThinQ is an way older cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, but LG was able to make it somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. Motorola Edge 50 features a little more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower 1220 x 2712px resolution and a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 captures much clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
LG V35 ThinQ has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.