Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Stylus, even though it was released only 23 months before. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G Stylus features longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.