Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's score of 79.9. The LG V35 ThinQ is an noticeably older cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but LG was able to build it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a display that is just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one, because although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Pro features superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.