Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A12's 80.3 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ is an noticeably older device than Galaxy A12, but it is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. LG V35 ThinQ features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a lot greater pixels density.
LG V35 ThinQ has more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A12, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A12 counts with a way better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A12 counts with just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.