Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, having an 84.7 score against 81.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A32 is way newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a way better pixel amount per display inch.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.