Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a score of 91.8 against 81.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better storage for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.