Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 84.9 score against 81.3. Samsung Galaxy A80's construction is newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's incredibly heavier and notably thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A80 captures slightly better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way better resolution camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A80 has just a bit longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.