Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a score of 90.5 against 81.3. Even though Galaxy A90 5G is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it is thicker and a lot heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater pixels number in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's processing unit is very similar to the LG V35 ThinQ one, they have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A90 5G has a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with greater battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.