Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's score of 81. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is newer and lighter, but a bit thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.