Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-03-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a score of 86.5 against 81.3. Even though the Galaxy M31 is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M31. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy M31 has a really longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.