Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. Galaxy M31s's construction is notably newer, but incredibly thicker and heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M31s. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a very superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Galaxy M31s features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.