Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with an 87.1 score against 81.3. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy Note9 is an a lot heavier and thicker phone than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ and the Galaxy Note9 both have similar processing units, both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 2880px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note9, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a much less MP camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy Note9 has longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.